Replacing Valve Stud in 289 Head

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Broncoholics

Broncoholics
Joined
Feb 24, 2004
Messages
1,301
Reaction score
4
Location
Washington State
I'm finally getting around to replacing my valve stud on my 289 head thats bad.

I pulled it out by stacking washers and tightened down the nut. No problem, came right out. I then double nutted the new stud with red loc-tite to hammer it in. I can only get it in half way. Been thinking to put the stud in the freezer over night and see if that works. Any other ideas?

 

jagscars

New member
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
So the stud was damaged, not the hole, right? did you run a tap through the hole to clean it? I've heard of guys buying a block of dry ice to shrink a part on.

JAG

 

Seabronc

New member
Joined
May 22, 2004
Messages
7,315
Reaction score
35
Location
North of NYC
Another possibility is to use a stud that is threaded on both ends like the ones used in a high performance head. You would have to make sure the stud works with your rocker arms and thread the hole in the head. You can use studs that came with the 289 High-Performance heads or Chevy LT-1, #397446.

By the way is that 289 head on a 302? A quote from one of my engine books by Pat Ganahl about using 289 heads on a 302.

"Some 302 engines built before this date", 10/21/68, " used .060-inch thick valve stem caps on the exhaust valves. Supposedly, the longer stem length was required for clearance with rail-type rockerarms, though rail rocker arms were introduced over two years before this. The main point is that there is a difference in pushrod lengths between the two engines, and the problem arises when the long pushrods (302) are used with short valves (289) and stock rockerarms. In such a situation the rocker arms will bind on the studs at full lift, often breaking the studs. ---- The solution is to install shorter push rods to correct the rocker angle." So the way I understand him is if using 289 heads use 289 pushrods.

He also says that the ***** in studs and guide plates are necessary if a high performance cam is installed.

If you want to read more about this get the book "Ford Performance, by Pat Ganahl". Most book stores have it and it is also available on Amazon.com.

Hope that info is helpful.

Good luck,

:)>-

 
OP
OP
Broncoholics

Broncoholics

Broncoholics
Joined
Feb 24, 2004
Messages
1,301
Reaction score
4
Location
Washington State
Well I'd like to say I have the stud replaced but I haven't been working on the Bronco lately. Been busy buying another Bronco, I'll have picts this week. So sweet but needs paint, rims and tires.

Thats interesting about the rod length. When I was at the part store they gave me 289 rods and said the 302 was slightly longer. I put the two side by side and couldn't see any difference. I'm sure there is but its not by much.

My studs are press in style so I can't clean up the hole with a tap.

I did have the stud in the freezer for weeks and was about to give it a try over this weekend and found the freezer died! AHHH!!! I found the stud in 1" deep blood. Man did that stink!

I've got it in the kitchen freezer now, hope its cold enough to make a difference. I might try the dry ice trick. If all else fails I'll take the head off again and have a stud put in at a machine shop.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
22,622
Messages
136,704
Members
25,282
Latest member
79' Buckin Bronco
Top