O2 Sensors

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Skitter302

Active member
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
749
Reaction score
147
Location
WA
I had some one share a theory with me that O² sensors in the exhaust should be replaced every 50,000 miles. The reason is that the sensor builds up with carbon and after a while doesn't read as accurately as when it wasn't full of carbon.

Now I thought this idea was kinda BS because I feel that the Error code light would come on if the sensor provided inaccurate readings. But given that ethanol laced fuel loves to reek havoc on our beloved Bronco's I feel that their might be some truth to this theory.

So I guess the question is... Replace the sensor because it could be full of carbon? or... Don't worry 'bout it because the Bronco runs just fine in.

 

Seabronc

New member
Joined
May 22, 2004
Messages
7,315
Reaction score
35
Location
North of NYC
Well, for other than general maintenance I stick to the, "if it ain't broke don't fix it", theory.  It might be worth puling to check the condition of the sensor but the computer should be able to sort out if the sensor is bad or not.  If it is running out of range, you will get a code from the computer along with the "check engine" light.

:)>-

 
OP
OP
Skitter302

Skitter302

Active member
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
749
Reaction score
147
Location
WA
What I'll do then is when the sun comes back out I'll crawl under and spray the sensor with a cleaner to see if that makes any difference. (Most likley not :meh: but what can I hurt?)

 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
22,667
Messages
136,905
Members
25,365
Latest member
Mgough
Top