While I can appreciate the comment, and this is not in fact an attempt at being contentious, I'm just not seeing how this is different from any other aspect of working on your own truck. If someone decides to install a 9" lift using nothing but taller springs the bump-steer will make it very dangerous to drive, front lift blocks do the same. The guy who decides to "tighten up" his steering box by cranking down on the steering gear pre-load ***** or the person who doesn't properly tighten his calipers down and loses one. Obviously it's everyone's responsibility to either do the work safely, pay someone else who can or park the vehicle.
Stainless Swagelok fittings are good to considerably more than the bursting pressure of stainless lines (6000PSI) and low-carbon lines (3500PSI). Properly installed the system will not leak or blow out. Simple as that. The Swageloks easily exceed the pressure rating of the braking system. Double flares are the industry standard because they're safe *enough* to take the rated pressure and they're cheap to install & maintain not because they're inherently superior. If the proper materials are used & the installation is correct stainless lines w/Swageloks exceed the pressure rating of the factory hydraulics. While I'm sure we've all seen poorly installed compression fittings it isn't rocket science, finger tight then one & a quarter turns with a wrench. No more, no less. Scribe a line on the body & nut and you can't get it wrong.
Now I'll grant that it may be a bad idea for *everyone* to run out & try it, exactly because of the experiences you relate, someone is bound to grab a brass fitting w/brass ferrules and try it out (Swagelok brass *bodies* have a 4000PSI pressure rating so when used with stainless or low-carbon ferrules (to properly swage onto the line) they still exceed the burst rating of standard low-carbon lines) but if someone who is aware of the facts and knows what he's doing chooses to go this route the system is no less safe then what was on there to begin with. The problem will always be with those who try to cut corners, are misinformed, or have poor work habits. I agree with your thoughts on soldered lines but was simply being polite.
No unsafe information was provided (by me at least, I cannot take responsibility for the thread as a whole) . The correct materials were referred to as well as the correct installation practices and manufacturers specs & info were referenced with links provided. It's no more of a burden to my conscience than if I tell someone how to install a lift & they fail to torque down the bolts resulting in a loss of control. I didn't elaborate any further than I did because JSM84 strikes me as the kind of guy who can turn a wrench & do it safely if given the necessary information.
checking out
http://www.familycar.com/brakes.htm what I read there was "You must never use brass "compression" fittings or copper tubing to repair a brake system. They are dangerous and illegal." From what I'm reading this confirms what I said in my post, that brass wouldn't work (a brass *body* will work but you must have ferrules that are harder than the material your brake line is made of, a distinction I specifically made and that was made only in reference to Swageloks)) I assume the illegal reference is to brass fittings as well but without a citation or knowledge of what state we're talking about it's hard to know.
http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?p=9490119 provides no specific or verifiable info either other than to correctly note that Swagelock's are not actually compression fittings but are in fact tube fittings. Swagelok's use a different 2-piece ferrule design than standard compression fittings. I should have made that distinction clear initially, I'm just used to calling them compression fittings. Specifically, Swagelok's are 2-ferrule/mechanical-grip type fittings. My bad.
http://www.swagelok.com/fittings/proper_se...ourceIdlt=33840
Neither of the other pages addresses the issues that I posted about. Admittedly the former state inspectors said they'd be reluctant to pass a vehicle with compression fittings but Swagelok's aren't compression fittings and I believe the intent of both their statements and the applicable laws is to keep people from using substandard parts to repair vehicles & by substandard I'm meaning parts that will cause the system to not function correctly or have a lower margin of safety than designed neither of which is an issue with what I discussed. The issue with compression fittings comes down to their pressure rating, pure & simple. Swagelok fittings have pressure ratings that far exceed the working or bursting pressure of factory braking systems & it's hard to see how that compromises safety. Hydraulic systems are one of Swagelok's intended applications, they're designed and patented to do this & to do it better than double-flared fittings. Yes, they *can* be installed incorrectly and that will compromise safety but you can say the same thing about any brake, suspension or steering work that someone chooses to do at home rather than pay a shop for and that possibility doesn't stop us from offering advise about those issues either.
Clearly this is a difference of opinion & I hope my post comes across as respectful. As I said, I'm not trying to be contentious and I honestly don't want to repeat or revisit past issues that I've had to apologize for. I'm honestly just not seeing the point. The fittings are rated far in excess of the system bursting pressure if installed correctly and I didn't think for a moment that JSM84 wouldn't be able to do that. My advise to someone I was unsure of would have been different.