Jump to content
66-96 Ford Broncos - Early & Full Size


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral


  • Rank
    Duck Tape L'fixer :)
  • Birthday 12/30/1959

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Elk River MN
  1. It would be nice to check by clicking a button for recent post,,, did i miss it here? or if there was 1 to push to see your own post, again maybe i can't find them and if that is the case then please inform me, thank you
  2. I just wanted to say great job on the new makeover on this site!!!!!! love it! way to go people looks nice
  3. well i hope you enjoy this,,,Visit My Website
  4. It is really the only good way of doing it,, it lightens up the front and keeps the mud out of the cooling fins but it has to be done right or there is a chance that the hoses may burst and scold everyone in the truck!!!
  5. So here is what i have now and i am going to put 2.5 rocks under it soon. i will post up pics as we get to work on it,,, wooohoooo. well it is a 1972 bronco chassy, typical ford 9" rear locked, dana 44 front, it is a mexican block 302 bored .040 over, ported and polished heads gasket matched to intake,edelbrock f4b dual plane manifold,holley 750 double,msd6al ignition,dec upright headers,very large radiator with dual fans mounted in the rear front to back 1 1/2 pipe copper pipe, orbital hydraulic steering with 2x8 ram full interior roll cage, aluminum custom dash,8 gallon stainless fuel cell,5.5 wild horses progressive springs mounted front and back. [attac hment=9522:24239045...plKOV_th.jpg][atta chment=9522:24239045...plKOV_th.jpg]
  6. it has matching rims but this pic was taken before i got them switched
  7. well the body is but it is actually a 1972 bronco
  8. Well i ordered my rod ends today
  9. i just got 2.5 ton Rockwell axles for this, Woooohoooo
  10. Like a lot of folks in this state, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test with which I have no problem. What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test. Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their lazy butts, doing drugs, while I work. . . . Can you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check? Pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't. Hope you all will pass it along, though . . . Something has to change in this country -- and soon!!!!! guess we could title that program, 'Urine or You're Out'.
  • Create New...